risk
chance the follow-up reads weaker than useful
High risk usually means you are asking for attention without enough new value or enough time gap.
follow-up timing check
See whether the second text adds value or just adds need.
double-text-risk scores one drafted follow-up against two realities:
how long it has been since your last outbound message, and how much pressure versus
value the new message adds. It is deterministic, immediate, and deliberately narrow.
zero API
same draft, same score
built for real send-or-stop moments
live checker
Score your follow-up
reasonable window
16 words · 0 questions
next step
send now
rewrite hints
use the $19 Deep Divewhat it scores
Timing, pressure, value, and whether text is still the right channel
timing
whether the silence window justifies a new touch
Sometimes the wording is fine and the problem is simply that it is too early.
channel shift
whether another text is already the weaker move
If enough time has passed, another text can be less credible than a clearer channel or a clean close.
good use
Use it when the draft is ready but the timing still feels unstable.
This is for client nudges, recruiter follow-ups, dating texts, and sales check-ins where the real risk is not wording alone. It is whether you are sending one message too many.
bad use
It will not tell you what the whole pattern means.
This page does not do deception detection, attachment theory, or relationship verdicts.
If the real issue is the full thread or the recurring person, the next step is tells.
privacy
No stored drafts. No model calls. No login wall.
Everything runs in the page. Refresh and the text is gone. This is a quick private pass, not a SaaS inbox.
next step
When the problem stops being one text, stop using one-text tools.
double-text-risk is the narrow first pass. tells is the paid
step when one thread, one person, or one repeating dynamic keeps pulling you back in.